Web-Based Assessment System Applying Many-Valued Logic

نویسندگان

  • Sylvia B. Encheva
  • Sharil Tumin
چکیده

The issue of rewarding partially correct answers has been addressed by many authors (Guzman, E. & Conejo, R., 2004, Gardner-Medwin, A.R. 1995, Huffman, D, Goldberg, F., & Michlin, M. 2003). Intelligent systems have been designed to assign scores related to the importance of missing or incorrect part of an answer. Such systems are meant to facilitate the process of knowledge assessment. While trying to be efficient in evaluating students’ responses these systems operate with the answers to a single question addressing learning a new term, understanding a new concept or mastering a new skill. However, experimental practice shows that asking several questions about the same item results in inconsistent and/or incomplete feedback, i.e. some of the answers are correct while others are partially correct or even incorrect. A large number of computer based systems and thus automated assessment systems lack the ability to reason with inconsistent information. Such a situation occurs when, f. ex. a student answers to two questions about one item and one of the answers is correct and the other one is incorrect or missing. Reasoning by applying classical logic cannot solve the problem because the presence of contradiction leads to trivialization, i. e. anything follows from ‘correct and incorrect’ and thus all inconsistencies are treated as equally bad (Priest, 2001). In this paper we discuss how to assess students’ understanding of new terms and concepts, shortly after they have been introduced in a subject. Application of many-valued logic allows the system to give meaningful responses in the presence of inconsistencies. Decision making rules, an intelligent agent is applying for assessing students’ understanding of new terms and concepts are presented. Such rules distinguish between students’ hesitation in the process of giving an answer and lack of knowledge. We propose use of the generalized Lukasiewicz’s logic in a Web-based assessment system as a way of resolving problems with inconsistent and/or incomplete input.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Working with Uncertainties in Knowledge Assessment

Boolean logic appears to be unable to draw conclusions in the presence of inconsistent and/or incomplete information. Fortunately, what seems to be impossible to solve applying binary logic can be achieved using nonbinary logic. In this work we use the theory of many-value logic to facilitate the deductive process of knowledge assessment. Key–Words: Web-based assessment, learning, intelligent t...

متن کامل

Truth Values and Connectives in Some Non-Classical Logics

The question as to whether the propositional logic of Heyting, which was a formalization of Brouwer's intuitionistic logic, is finitely many valued or not, was open for a while (the question was asked by Hahn). Kurt Gödel (1932) introduced an infinite decreasing chain of intermediate logics, which are known nowadays as Gödel logics, for showing that the intuitionistic logic is not finitely (man...

متن کامل

TREE AUTOMATA BASED ON COMPLETE RESIDUATED LATTICE-VALUED LOGIC: REDUCTION ALGORITHM AND DECISION PROBLEMS

In this paper, at first we define the concepts of response function and accessible states of a complete residuated lattice-valued (for simplicity we write $mathcal{L}$-valued) tree automaton with a threshold $c.$ Then, related to these concepts, we prove some lemmas and theorems that are applied in considering some decision problems such as finiteness-value and emptiness-value of recognizable t...

متن کامل

Representation and Reasoning about Changing Semantics in Heterogeneous

Changes of semantics in data sources further complicate the semantic heterogeneity problem. We identify four types of semantic heterogeneities related to changing semantics and present a solution based on an extension to the Context Interchange (COIN) framework. Changing semantics is represented as multi-valued contextual attributes in a shared ontology; however, only a single value is valid ov...

متن کامل

Representation and Reasoning About Changing Semantics in Heterogeneous Data Sources

Changes of semantics in data sources further complicate the semantic heterogeneity problem. We identify four types of semantic heterogeneities related to changing semantics and present a solution based on an extension to the Context Interchange (COIN) framework. Changing semantics is represented as multi-valued contextual attributes in a shared ontology; however, only a single value is valid ov...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009